Brittney Spears in no longer a blond. That was an actual news headline two days ago. Personally, I'm amazed she has hair, but hey. Seriously though, when she was this ongoing train wreck I could understand the somewhat macabre fascination with the downward spiral which had become her life. It was like watching a soap opera. But when you get down to a headline declaring a change of hair color ... well, we have spiraled down to the pit WITH her.
That David Goldman returns to New Jersey with his son. For those of you unaware, we have a classic case of parent abducts child and takes child out of the country without consent of the other parent. Mr. Goldman had been in a court battle to get his child back when the mother died over a year ago. Well it's OBVIOUS now, if it wasn't before, that the boy should have been returned. Right?
Wrong.
it's taken over a year for the Brazil court to finally decided to allow the boy back with his father. For now. The case in on appeal. The boy's family in Brazil are fighting for custody.
U.S. senators are calling for stronger international laws to force countries to return children when they've been abducted by a parent. They want penalties for countries who don't immediately return said children. There's already a law in place, which the U.S. and Brazil have both signed. But with over 1,200 U.S. children still being held in other countries after being abducted, the U.S. says the laws need to be stronger and better enforced.
One name. Elian Gonzalez.
You remember him, don't you? Kidnapped by his mother. Brought to the U.S. in an unsafe boat and trip during which his mother and several others drowned. In fact, he was one of only three survivors. It took the U.S. seven months to decide to finally return this abducted child back to his father. So could someone please tell me how the U.S. government has any right to indignation and finger pointing. After all, aren't Brazil and the other countries just following our shining example?
Tiger Woods is loosing endorsement deals. I just don't get it. As POTUS you can screw a girl just a few years older than your own daughter. You can do her with a cigar while dignitaries from other countries are waiting. You can discuss issues on national security in front of young girl who is giving you a blow job. You can have several issues of sexual harassment. You can be known for your "philandering". And all this is okay.
But be a golf star and whore around on your wife and you're a dirt bag who deserves to loose everything.
Now I think they're both assholes, but in reality, Tiger hurt his wife and children. Clinton discussed top secret issues of national security with a slutty intern. Whose worse?
~*~*~Krystal~*~*~
2 comments:
Clinton's worse, because he stood on a moral platform and pretended to be a moral role model for our children. Tiger never did that, to my knoledge. He is a sports role model. Period. He never signed anything stating that he was a role model for husbands everywhere. Stupid country club members are the ones who decided that Tiger Woods was their marital hero, because he married a blond Swedish bikini goddess and had babies with her! Good grief.
Can you tell I'm a bit pissed about this?
We can be so stupid.
I've watched local news coverage of dumbass men and women on golf courses just scratching their heads saying crap like "Well, he's not our favorite anymore". Oh, please. As if they don't have some dirty little secrets fo their own.
Sometimes people make me sick. They just want someone to kick around so they can feel better about their own shit.
I'm out.
;-)
Well written, well said.
Post a Comment