From the Constitution Libertarian desk of
Krystal A. Kelly

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Could Legal Marijuana Save California's Economy

Probably not, but there were a few interesting points made in this article.

Could legal marijuana save California’s economy?

Marijuana is California's largest cash crop. It's valued at $14 billion annually, or nearly twice the value of the state's grape and vegetable crops combined, according to government statistics. Indeed, a recent report pegged marijuana as two-thirds of the economy of Mendocino County, a ganja hotbed north of San Francisco. That's not surprising—it costs $400 to grow a pound of pot that can sell for $6,000 on the street.

But the state doesn't receive any revenue from its cash cow. Instead, it spends billions of dollars enforcing laws pegged at shutting down the industry and inhibiting marijuana's adherents. Of course, there's a reason for that. Marijuana's social costs may include addiction and rehabilitation treatment and lost productivity. Yet these are minute compared with the extensive social costs of alcohol or tobacco.

Of course, just legalizing pot wouldn't automatically harvest revenues for the state. An organized system of regulating sales and collecting taxes would need implementing. And it's possible that general drug use could rise, though the debate that pot is a gateway drug to harder substances is inconclusive.

So what are the numbers? A national legalization effort would save nearly $13 billion annually in enforcement costs and bring in $7 billion in yearly tax revenues, according to a study by Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron. Since California represents 13 percent of the U.S. economy, those numbers suggest the state could save $1.7 billion in enforcement costs and nab up to $1 billion in revenues. That doesn't include any indirect revenues as, for example, rural farming communities grow or marijuana tourism, which has been lucrative for the Netherlands, takes off.




Peace Out,

~*~*~Krystal~*~*~

3 comments:

Brooke said...

Anything for a buck to fuel those socialist programs, eh?

Puke.

Krystal said...

Whether they do it for a buck or not, I don't much care. Face it, people can grow it in a container in their own backyard. Government won't make that much.

BUT...

we won't be spending $13 BILLIONS on something that is a "minute" issue compared to the problems caused by alcohol and tabacco.

Wouldn't that money be better spent keeping rapists and chid molesters locked up?

Misfit410 said...

If they treat it as a controlled substance the government sells it and uses it's revenue to replace high taxes, I'd be game.

Music


Get a playlist! Standalone player Get Ringtones

98

As a 1930s wife, I am
Very Superior

Take the test!