I really want to discuss this war on women and discuss some things that neither the liberal media nor the conservative media have really brought up. Now the conservative media has touched on some of what I have to say, but they're missing quite a bit.
The War on Women, and there is one going on, comes down to three basic components: a woman's reproductive rights and a woman's right to a career which leads to her right to be independent. There is so much to say.
Let's start with birth control. Democrats are all up in arms over a woman's right to free birth control saying that Republicans are opposed to birth control all together.
1. Republicans are not opposed to birth control. They never have been. Some may choose not to use it, but then again, look at all the Democrats who choose not to use it as well. Just take a look at the welfare rolls ...
2. Condoms are free and easily accessible at any health department. They work really well when you use them. I've never become pregnant when they were used. I know other couples who have never had accidental pregnancies using condoms. I know quite a few birth control pill babies though.
3. The fact that the democrats think that women are incapable of obtaining BC-pills on their own ($9 at Wal-Mart), goes to show that the democrat party truly believes that women are INCAPABLE of taking care of themselves. How insulting!
4. BC-pills may help with POCS and help prevent pregnancy, HOWEVER they greatly increase the chances of DVT, stroke, heart attack and breast cancer in the women who use them. There is also a higher rate in infertility and miscarriage amoung women who use them. Yet the government thinks they should be doled out for free. Hmmmmmm ...
So in regards to birth control, I'd say it's the DEMOCRATS who are waging a war against women.
Independence from needing men. Democrats push that women can care for themselves and don't need men to help them. Republicans believe that a woman may choose to work at home or outside the home, but men need to be responsible to care for the women in their lives and treat them with respect.
1. The Republicans say use BC-pills if you want, but we believe that you are fully capable of coming up with $9 yourself. As previously stated, the Democrats say free birth control because women can't afford it (again, $9 a month at W-M). The Democrats want a country of women, who have full reproductive rights, to be RELIANT on the government, run mostly by men, for their own birth control.
2. Both sides believe that a man should pay child support. However, how can a group of people, Democrats, say that a woman has a right to her own reproductive organs and her body and should be able to choose to have, OR NOT HAVE, a baby ... then say she is too weak and incapable of supporting that child on her own? I mean, if a woman chooses to have a baby when the father has said he wants no part of it, shouldn't she support that child on her own ... without a man? I'm just saying.
So, who is really standing behind what they say? Not the Democrats. They are trying to make women depend on others, instead of themselves, when it comes to their reproductive rights. Definately the Democrat's war on women here.
Let's look at abortion. In general, Democrats are pro-abortion all the time, many even up through the second and third trimester. They want no waiting period and feel that minors should have access without parental consent. Republicans, in general, are pro-life, or at the least say no abortion after the end of the first trimester. The feel that minors are MINORS and should not be able to have an abortion, an outpatient surgical procedure, without parental consent.
1. Classic clique, "Half of the babies aborted are female." Okay. Said.
2. Abortion is a surgical procedure. There is a risk of sterility and/or inability to carry a child after an abortion. Cervical damage is done during an abortion. A compromised cervix can be incapable of carrying a baby to term. For many women, the damage to the cervix results in painful sex for the rest of her life. Infection can occur up to 40 days after an abortion. PID is common among women who have had an abortion. PID can cause inflammation of one or both of the fallopian tubes. If not treated immediately, there is a high probability that sterility will occur. Those are just a few long term and permanent side affects of abortions.
Also, there is need for post-op care. Hemorrhaging is not uncommon. There have been many cases of teenaged girls bleeding out and dieing after an abortion because their parents did not know the abortion was done and did not know to keep an eye on their daughter. I don't get it. They can't give my child a Tylenol without my permission.
3. Democrats claim to be pro-choice when they are really pro-abortion and anti-choice. How do I come to this? Well, a true choice can't be made if all the fact aren't made available. Democrats routinely stand in the way of legislation that would require any female wanting an abortion to see and ultrasound of their child and then wait three days. They are okay with the ultrasound but say that a women should not have to see it. Why? They say it's cruel. In reality? In poor neighborhoods 50% of women change their minds when shown an ultrasound and in middle to upper class it's 90% of women change their minds. They know this. Yet they block legislation to require FULL DISCLOSURE and a 72-hour waiting time for a woman to make an educated choice between life and death.
More women seek help at crisis pregnancy centers for post-abortion counseling than for help in a crisis pregnancy. Women who have had abortions come to the reality of what they've done, sometimes years after the fact. They deal with depression and suicidal thoughts every year around the anniversary of their abortion. So when it comes to abortion, who is waging the war against women? Democrats.
Career choice for women. Democrats say that a woman should be able to choose what she wants to do with her life. So do Republicans. But how do they REALLY feel? Let's see ...
1. “Ann Romney has never worked a day in her life.” - Hilary Stupid Bitch Rosen
Ann Romney raised five boys. She was involved in their education. And who cares if she lived a life of luxury, as the Democrats apparently think SAHM's do, or if they were rolling in the dough and lighting bonfires with hundred dollar bills. It was her chosen career. It was her CHOICE (I thought the democrats were all about choice). And currently raising five boys and one girl myself, I GUARANTEE you that I work harder than most women do at their jobs every day. Do you have any idea how many women I've met who have said they work because they CAN'T HANDLE THE STRESS OF STAYING AT HOME WITH THEIR CHILDREN ALL DAY?!?!?!?! I'd love to have Rosen come to my house and do MY job for a week.
2. " ... once Michelle and I had our girls, she gave it her all to balance raising a family and pursuing a career ... we didn’t have the luxury for her not to work ... she’d feel guilty that she wasn’t giving enough time to her work, and when she was at work, she was feeling guilty she wasn’t giving enough time for the girls ..." - The Grand Master Idiot, Obama.
Here is my list of luxuries the first few years I stayed home:
1. A/C set at 85 during the S. Florida summers to keep the electric bill down.
2. One pound of ground beef and one cut up chicken for the ENTIRE week. The rest was pasta and beans.
3. Cloth diapers.
4. Clothing with literal holes in them because there wasn't any cash to buy myself more.
5. Using cloth for my "monthly" because it was either kotex or food.
6. 1,000 sq feet of living space for SEVEN people (I LOVED that house!!!).
7. Our big date? A rented movie and one single lottery ticket.
8. No health insurance (still don't have that one).
9. Used furniture that was given to us (was always very grateful for it though).
Need.I.Go.On?
However, just to be fair, let's take a look at how much money they were making when she was feeling so guilty about leaving those girls because they didn't have the "luxury" for her to stay home. I mean, OBVIOUSLY, they must have absolutely NEEDED her income to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table, right? I'm sure she had to make the choice between kotex and food, right? That was what forced her to pursue a career outside the home ... tampons ... I'm sure of it. Well, let's see ... When Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2005 they had a combined salary of $479,062. Barack was making $162,100. Michele was making $316,962. I seriously doubt that she had to work for tampons ...
So tell me again, Asshole, how you and Michele lacked the "luxury" for her to stay home? I mean, WOW!!! We are a family of eight. I stay home. My husband makes less than half of what YOU made in '05 when Michele just had to
abandon her 4 and 7 year old daughters so she could have a big house, expensive clothing, and lots of jewelry force herself to go to work to keep the family out of poverty.
As far as waging a war on women in their choices of career? It's the democrats. They'll support you if you stick your kids in daycare, but not if you stay home. And spare me the BS of how to handle economics. If there is anything a SAHM understands, it's how to sacrifice and make choices between needs and wants. In fact, we have a better taste of reality than most married women who work.
So, is there a War of Women? Damn straight there is! But it's the Democrats who are waging it!
Peace Out,
~*~*~Krystal~*~*~
